Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Tayacaja Daniel Hernández Morillo - UNAT

Science of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in lower third molar extractions. A literature review
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

anesthesia
articaine
extraction

How to Cite

Espinoza Plaza, J., Ascanoa Olazo, J. A. ., & Valenzuela Ramos, M. R. (2022). Science of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in lower third molar extractions. A literature review. Llamkasun, 3(1), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.47797/llamkasun.v3i1.95

Abstract

The efficacy of a local anesthetic in a surgical procedure such as lower third molar extraction is very important given the complexity of this procedure such as incision, flap, odontosection and ostectomy, curettage, lavage and suture.

Local anesthetics are drugs that reversibly inhibit nerve conduction in the area where they are applied (Almeida et al., 2020), inhibiting the perception of pain, with the sequence being: increased skin temperature and vasodilation, loss of pain and thermal sensitivity, loss of perception, loss of sensation of touch and pressure and loss of motor skills(Arribas Blanco et al., 2001), the anesthetic effect varies between 2 to 4 hours approximately.

Currently, several studies suggest that Articaine 4% should be used in extractions of lower third molars because it has better clinical properties compared to Lidocaine 2%, both associated with epinephrine 1: 100,000000  (Almeida et al., 2020) (Zhang et al., 2021) (Vademecun, 2020) (Larocca de Geus et al., 2020) (Rossi et al., 2021) (Baeza et al., 2020),  , these are amide group anesthetics and both have been shown to be safe for any dental procedure that requires avoiding intense pain (endodontics, restorations, extractions, etc.).

https://doi.org/10.47797/llamkasun.v3i1.95
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Almeida, P.-C., Raldi, F.-V., Sato, F.-R., Nascimento, R.-D., & Moraes, M.-B. (2020). Volume and effectiveness assessment of articain 4% versus mepivacaine 2% used in third molar surgery: Randomized, double-blind, split-mouth controlled clinical trial. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal, 25(6), e762-e768.

Arribas Blanco, J. M., Rodríguez Pata, N., Esteve Arrola, B., & Beltrán Martín, M. (2001). Anestesia local y locorregional en cirugía menor. Medicina de Familia. SEMERGEN, 27(9), 471-481.

Baeza, S., Leiton, E., & Zárate, N. (2020). Caracterización de lidocaína y articaína mediante técnica troncular en exodoncias de terceros molares inferiores incluidos. Applied Sciences in Dentistry, 1.

Boonsiriseth, K., Chaimanakarn, S., Chewpreecha, P., Nonpassopon, N., Khanijou, M., Ping, B., & Wongsirichat, N. (2017). 4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 17(1), 29-35.

García, O. M. F., & Medrano, M. G. C. (2010). Atención odontológica en la mujer embarazada. Archivos de Investigación Materno Infantil, 2(2), 80-84.

Jain, N. K., & John, R. R. (2016). Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches, 10(2), 356-361.

Larocca de Geus, J., Nogueira da Costa, J. K., Wambier, L. M., Maran, B. M., Loguercio, A. D., & Reis, A. (2020). Different anesthetics on the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: A network systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 151(2), 87-97.e4.

Mittal, J., Kaur, G., Mann, H. S., Narang, S., Kamra, M., Kapoor, S., Sindhi, M., & Kataria, R. (2018). Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 19(6), 743-748.

Rossi, M. T., de Oliveira, M. N., Vidigal, M. T. C., de Andrade Vieira, W., Figueiredo, C. E., Blumenberg, C., de Almeida, V. L., Paranhos, L. R., Oliveira, L. B., Siqueira, W. L., & de Brito Júnior, R. B. (2021). Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations, 25(1), 1-22.

Vademecun. (2020). Articaína + epinefrina .

Zhang, D., Liao, H., Jia, Y., Yang, W., He, P., Wang, D., Chen, Y., Yang, W., & Zhang, Y.-P. (2021). Effect of virtual reality simulation training on the response capability of public health emergency reserve nurses in China: A quasiexperimental study. BMJ Open, 11(9), e048611.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Jose Espinoza Plaza, Jimmy Antonio Ascanoa Olazo, Marisel Roxana Valenzuela Ramos

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...